Biden Falls Short on Criminal Justice Reform in First 100 Days

I saw a May 2, 2021 article by Sarah Martinson from online Law360 that stated President Joe Biden came up short on his promise to reform criminal justice. As a matter of fact, from what I saw of his plan it was a major part of his campaign platform, and he dedicated pages of website content to it. Seeing this back then, I sent him a copy of my book In the Matter of Edwin Potter to help him develop some ideas from the point of view of someone who has been through the system with SMI (serious mental illness). He sent me a thank you. What I did not expect, unlike Sarah Martinson, is that he would develop it further before June or July – early summer – and so it happened. After his inauguration, he stated that he would like to find a challenging opportunity for VP Kamala Harris. This turned the light on in my head, and I sent him another letter suggesting that she be given the opportunity to work on mental illness and criminal justice reform. Lo and Behold! Biden made the announcement that she would be working on criminal justice reform. You decide if I had anything to do with that.

These ideas of mine are outlined in the book and taken from as far back as May 1998. Many of my ideas work as demonstrated by the successful efforts at the John Jay College Institute of Justice and Opportunity to apply them: education, mentoring, job training, drug rehab, social skills, housing.

Stay with me. It will come. Just be patient.

To read more articles, access David Geiger’s blog at www.davidegeiger.com

Read Goodreads reviews of In the Matter of Edwin Potter at www.davidegeiger.com

Read the preview at In the Matter of Edwin Potter: Mental Illness and Criminal Justice Reform: Geiger, David E.: 9780692797822: Amazon.com: Books

IMOEP is available at Amazon, Goodreads, Barnes & Noble, and www.davidegeiger.com

David Geiger is a licensed and retired professional electrical engineer who spent 7 years in psychiatric hospitals and over 40 years since 1979 in the courts as a result of his schizophrenia.

 

What to Do Today for the Mentally Ill

AdobeStock_73948985.jpeg

There are some pretty nice people who I have met on my harrowing journey through mental illness. Some already hold the position that having mental illness is not a crime nor is it a moral weakness. Then there are those who are not so nice, and it seems to stem from the possibility that they do not understand. Their position is that prisoners do not want to work – so I am told, that they already have an education – so I am also told. That is not what I saw during my time in the maximum-security facility. They do not want to hear it. Are they browbeating me? Do they belong to a supremacy group?

Old-school thought leaves the prisoner or the one with mental illness to fend for himself with loads of obstacles to overcome. We are a laughingstock. I remember an old priest to whom I gave a copy of my book. He never talked to me again. Where is the love of Jesus in that? People who need help most are the ones supported least. If the Church does not help, who will? But there is controversy in the Church about this matter. Paulists have a ministry in the prisons based upon Matthew’s gospel chapter 25, “When I was in prison you visited me.” It brings tears to my eyes. When I sent the president of the ministry – also a priest – a copy of my book, his response was essentially that I had hit the nail on the head, “recidivism is almost inevitable – the lack of education, financial opportunities, social support, and the general climate of prisoners – which leads us to release prisoners with virtually no chance to go in a different direction.”

There are lines that are drawn. This from a former CEO of a mental illness support organization regarding mass shooters, “Not all have schizophrenia and not all people who suffer from schizophrenia without treatment harm others, and many harm themselves or are killed by others. Most people with schizophrenia are arrested and incarcerated for minor incidents and deteriorate while incarcerated.”

So, what do we do? One practical problem for one with serious mental illness is that the Law forbids that we help him unless he asks. According to the psychiatrists that never happens, and so he is left to worsen until he finally kills someone and becomes an enemy of the State. The public then demands that the Law – not doctors – address the issue by throwing him into prison. This is useless.

This means that the Law must be changed by legislators.

A second practical problem is to bring new blood with training and experience with these new ideas that I am postulating into our judicial process. We currently have dinosaurs running the show. They treat the mentally ill like they are criminals – the criminalization of mental illness. This must stop, and the mentally ill should be treated by doctors, not by lawyers and judges.

 

To read more articles, access David Geiger’s blog at www.davidegeiger.com

Read Goodreads reviews of In the Matter of Edwin Potter at www.davidegeiger.com

IMOEP is available at Amazon, Goodreads, Barnes & Noble, and www.davidegeiger.com

David Geiger is a licensed and retired professional electrical engineer who spent 7 years in psychiatric hospitals and over 40 years since 1979 in the courts as a result of his schizophrenia.

 

Again?

AdobeStock_319475929.jpeg

I do not wax religious in my blogs, but today I will step a bit in that direction.

The Angel of Death is struggling to consume us. Just a few days ago as I write this a jury of the peers of Derek Michael Chauvin convicted him for killing George Floyd. The conviction of Chauvin – a former police officer of the Minneapolis, Minnesota police department– is a step in the right direction in my opinion to address these difficult matters. There was nothing wrong with his mind otherwise he would have pleaded insanity. But this has happened before with no action taken to right the wrongs.

It is Easter season for Christianity, the celebration of Christ’s victory over sin and death. All lives matter. Some, I guess, did not get the memo. Others did. Let us hope and work together to eradicate behaviors like those of Derek Michael Chauvin.

 

To read more articles, access David Geiger’s blog at www.davidegeiger.com

Read Goodreads reviews of In the Matter of Edwin Potter at www.davidegeiger.com

IMOEP is available at Amazon, Goodreads, Barnes & Noble, and www.davidegeiger.com

Reflections on Building A Partnership with Corrections

PrisonersInClass.jpg

What follows comes from a recent email to me from The John Jay College Institute for Justice and Opportunity. I have been advocating for education and mentoring for prisoners since May 1998.

 

The John Jay College Institute for Justice and Opportunity is excited to share our latest publication, Reflections on Building a Partnership with Corrections: A Resource Guide for College-in-Prison Programs

New York has been a leader in education in prison since the 1800s. At its peak in the 1990s, when incarcerated people were eligible for federal Pell and New York State Tuition Assistance Program (TAP) grants, New York had 70 higher education programs operating in state prisons. In the mid-1990s, when legislators revoked Pell and TAP for incarcerated people, the number of students dropped from 3,445 to 256. In December 2020, after a 26-year ban, congress reinstated access to federal Pell grants for incarcerated students. Now, with 67 new programs receiving Second Chance Pell status, we are disseminating this publication to help providers cultivate and improve relationships with their corrections partners. 

This guide is part of an effort to provide college providers with the necessary tools for developing programs that are responsive to the unique environment of correctional facilities. While designed specifically for college programs that operate in New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS) facilities, this guide may also be useful for organizations and colleges outside of New York that wish to establish or enhance college-in-prison programs.

Reflections on Building a Partnership with Corrections grew out of our work operating the Prison-to-College Pipeline, our college-in-prison program at Otisville Correctional Facility, and our Technical Assistance work to seven college-in-prison providers throughout New York State. It includes information on the history of college-in-prison programs in New York state, foundations for productive partnerships, the structure and legal authority of DOCCS, policies and procedures relevant to college-in-prison programs, job descriptions of key facility staff, and insights informed by our collective experiences working with DOCCS.

Click here to read the guide. 

We would like to thank the staff and partners who contributed to this project. We would also like to express our sincerest gratitude to the District Attorney of New York's Criminal Justice Investment Initiative and the CUNY Institute for State and Local Governance for funding this project. 

For more information, please contact Taylor DeClerck, Technical Assistance Coordinator, at tdeclerck@jjay.cuny.edu

 

To read more articles, access David Geiger’s blog at www.davidegeiger.com

Read Goodreads reviews of In the Matter of Edwin Potter at www.davidegeiger.com

IMOEP is available at Amazon, Goodreads, Barnes & Noble, and www.davidegeiger.com

Mass Shooters: What to Do?

AdobeStock_159803832.jpeg

Now that COVID-19 has come under control, it seems that we now return to business-as-usual: mass shootings at the mall by the mentally ill who are then put in jail or prison with no medical treatment to speak of.

This has got to end. The problem is that the Law – the Law – forbids helping the mentally ill unless they ask for it. As any psychiatrist will tell you, this does not happen. So, the shootings continue.

There is, however, a newly formed organization called Hope Street Coalition whose goal is to address the fundamental issues, namely, homelessness, bad laws and policies, and SMI (serious mental illness). Its founder, Paul Webster, is former Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Senior Policy Advisor. See the Feb. 4, 2021 video about his launch Video Archives - Healing Minds NOLA and give him your support  website .

To read more articles, access David Geiger’s blog at www.davidegeiger.com

Read Goodreads reviews of In the Matter of Edwin Potter at www.davidegeiger.com

IMOEP is available at Amazon, Goodreads, Barnes & Noble, and www.davidegeiger.com

See also In the Matter of Edwin Potter: Mental Illness and Criminal Justice Reform | David Geiger - YouTube

Solitary Confinement Will End

AdobeStock_191043924.jpeg

Some of the people in the judicial system suffer from anosognosia – they have no idea of just how short-sighted they are. Let us take Edwin Potter’s judge – the Honorable Reanna Wood – as an example. Instead of working with him because he has some ideas that work in reducing crime by the way, she tries to destroy him by taking his job opportunities away on numerous occasions. Technically he is not on Probation or Parole. When reading a document into the Court record, she only reads the parts that make Edwin look bad. She read a copy of his book and had nothing to say. His attorney asked him, “What was the point?” To top it off, she took his grown children away from him because he sent them Hallmark cards once per month.

What is he supposed to do? Say, “Thank you?” Tell her she is doing a fine job? Ridiculous! How does doing all that help to make a better society? These are among the reasons that society has the problems that it does. He is not a child. It is her time to step down and let some new blood in there who is trained and experienced in these new ideas that, again, work. 

Does he think that he can get away with saying all of that?

 This is America. Yes.

As an example of what can and should be done, Mayor Bill DeBlasio and the NYC Board of Corrections today, March 9, 2021, announced an end to solitary confinement in New York City jails. Solitary confinement is meant as a response to violence in the prison, but it drives people crazy and turns them into monsters. The text of the email regarding this from JoAnne Page, President, and CEO of the Fortune Society whose tag line is “Building People, Not Prisons” is given here.

 

Dear  David,

Today, Mayor DeBlasio and the NYC Board of Corrections announced an end to solitary confinement in New York City jails. We are proud that our Executive Vice President and Vice-Chair of the NYC Board of Corrections, Stanley Richards, was a leader in bringing an end to this inhumane practice.  

Stanley spoke at Mayor DeBlasio's press conference earlier today where they announced the plan for ending solitary confinement in City jails. Hear Stanley talk about the importance of this moment as an African American, formerly justice-involved man who understands the need for this reform:

The proposed disciplinary framework will eliminate the use of solitary confinement and other forms of restrictive housing and replace it with a more fair and transparent system rooted in the humanity and safety of officers, staff, and detained people. The full text of the proposal is available here.

We are so grateful to the City, Mayor DeBlasio, and the NYC Board of Corrections for making this a priority. And of course, a tremendous thank you to Stanley for his tireless commitment to improving the lives of the justice-involved. 

This work is far from over, but we are heartened by the dedication of our legislators and leaders and confident that criminal-justice reform will continue. It is with support from people like you that we can ensure it happens. 

Thank you,
JoAnne Page
President & CEO
The Fortune Society

  

To read more articles, access David Geiger’s blog at www.davidegeiger.com

To read more Goodreads reviews of In the Matter of Edwin Potter at www.davidegeiger.com

Available at Amazon, Goodreads, Barnes & Noble, and www.davidegeiger.com

See also In the Matter of Edwin Potter by David Geiger | News Feature - YouTube

David Geiger is a retired, licensed, and awarded electrical engineer who spent 7 years in psychiatric hospitals and over 40 years since 1979 in the courts as a result of his schizophrenia.

Hope Street Coalition Goals

AdobeStock_168640742.jpeg

Submitted by David E. Geiger, MEE, PE (retired)

(Sent to me by Janet Hays, Director of Healing Minds NOLA)

Dear David E. Geiger,

Thank you for participating in our February 4th discussion on Housing & Homelessness:  Ending Street Suffering. The response was overwhelming, and excitement is growing!

Interest is pouring in from people all across America who are hearing about Hope Street Coalition, a new initiative addressing the intersection of homelessness, mental illness, and addiction. Hope Street seeks to help people deteriorating in plain sight through advocacy and raising awareness of suffering on the streets.

Watch the Video

Download the Slides

Healing Minds NOLA is honored to have been chosen to host the launch of Hope Street Coalition with guests Paul Webster, former Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Advisor; Dr. Drew Pinsky, physician & popular media figure; and Dr. Elinore McCance-Katz, First Assistant Secretary under HHS for Mental Health & Substance Use and the Director of the Substance Use and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). 

Hope Street Coalition will partner with anyone, and any organization, ready to change the status quo. Together, through advocacy, the Coalition will put an end to the shameful abandonment of people living with chronic untreated serious mental illnesses and substance use disorders to our streets, prisons, jails, and morgues. Goals include:

 

  • Reduce the amount of unsheltered homelessness,

  • Increase the amount of treatment beds and units,

  • Remove obstacles to treatment,

  • Encourage the participation of families and loved ones, and 

  • Stop treating those with illnesses as criminals.

 

Hope Street will work to immediately address the antiquated discriminatory and harmful rule - known as the "IMD Exclusion" (click on this) - that has fueled the decades long decline of long-term psychiatric bed capacity. By uniting our voices, we can remove this policy barrier that has led to so much suffering.

Be sure to connect at http://hopestreetcoalition.org to stay engaged. A new strategy will be unveiled soon!

Janet Hays, Director - Healing Minds NOLA

HealingMindsNOLA@gmail.com

(504) 274 6091

To read more articles, access David Geiger’s blog at www.davidegeiger.com

To read Goodreads reviews of In the Matter of Edwin Potter go to www.davidegeiger.com

IMOEP is available at Amazon, Goodreads, Barnes & Noble, and www.davidegeiger.com

See also In the Matter of Edwin Potter by David Geiger | News Feature - YouTube

David Geiger is a retired, licensed, and awarded electrical engineer who spent 7 years in psychiatric hospitals and over 40 years since 1979 in the courts

A Note on Biden's Executive Order to Ban the Use of Federal Private Prisons

PrisonDoorDollar.jpg

Submitted by David E. Geiger, MEE, PE (retired)

(Note: The following article comes from the John Jay College Institute for Justice and Opportunity's monthly mailing, Several years ago, I believe it was, New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer moved to no longer invest NYC money into private prisons. One of his reasons was that it was immoral. This is how far we have come.)

On January 26th, 2021, President Biden signed an executive order banning the Department of Justice from renewing contracts with private prisons, a President Obama-era policy reversed under President Trump. While this is an important step forward, it will only impact 11 private federal prisons. This executive order will not have any impact on facilities contracted by ICE, which detains 81% of people in facilities that are privately owned or managed. Further, it will have no impact on state contracts with private prisons, which incarcerate roughly 7% of all incarcerated individuals

The first for-profit prison was established in Tennessee in 1984, before that they did not exist. Private prisons are notorious for having more safety and security incidents per capita, as well as higher rates of violence both between incarcerated individuals and staff. On top of that, private prison employees earn considerably less each year and receive 58 hours less of training

Private prisons are only one small part of mass incarceration in the US; however, private industries do continue to profit off of prisons — from prison food and health services to telecom and commissary businesses. Profiting off of incarceration drives people and families into debt — for example, a call from a New York jail can cost $9.95 for 15 minutes

We commend President Biden's actions to reduce capitalization from mass incarceration and its profound impact on our already marginalized communities, but there is more work to be done, including extending these limitations to state systems, addressing the root causes of mass incarceration, and ensuring that those with conviction histories are not excluded from access to opportunities and do not face perpetual punishment.

To read reviews of In the Matter of Edwin Potter go to www.Goodreads.com

To read more articles, access David Geiger’s blog at www.davidegeiger.com

IMOEP is available at Amazon, Goodreads, Barnes & Noble, and www.davidegeiger.com

David Geiger is a retired licensed and awarded electrical engineer who spent 7 years in psychiatric hospitals and over 40 years since 1979 in the courts as a result of his schizophrenia.

 

Hope Street Coalition for the Homeless

AdobeStock_348312506.jpeg

On February 4, 2021, Janet Hays, Director of her organization Healing Minds NOLA, held a webinar called “Paul Webster on Homelessness and Ending Street Suffering.” Paul Webster, MPP is the former HUD Senior Policy Advisor. Today he was launching his organization “Hope Street Coalition.” Guest speakers were Elinore McCance-Katz, MD, Ph.D. – 1st HHS Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use – and Drew Pinsky, MD – Practicing Physician/ Media Host.

Money is not the problem. Federal funding for homelessness assistance has increased by 240% over the past ten years. But homelessness itself has also increased as well during that time. Giving a homeless person a room is not the answer to the problem as experience has shown. Some religious organizations we are told are happy just to give the homeless person a sandwich and send him on his way. Much of the problem is due to serious mental illness (SMI) and chronic drug addiction.

Homelessness is getting bad. What is the problem if not money – and apparently there is plenty of that available? Currently, the law forbids treatment unless the person asks for it, and that does not happen. I wrote about this before, and I will repeat it here: According to psychiatrists such as Drew Pinsky, the mentally ill are seen as hostile and undesirable because their illnesses are left untreated – by Law as the person cannot be given treatment against his will – and left to worsen until they finally kill someone and become an enemy of the State. The public then demands that the Law – not doctors – address the issue by throwing them into prison. This is useless. The only thing that happens is that the mentally ill end up with a prison record with all that entails and with no medical treatment of value. If this is not THE problem, it is certainly A problem that needs to be addressed.

According to Drew Pinsky, there are 65,000 people who are deteriorating and dying on the streets of Los Angeles. The Federal government sets a funding cap for only 16 beds. This tells me that these people are of no value to society. What if it were your brother? Or your father?

So, today Paul Webster launched his organization “Hope Street Coalition” to address homelessness. He has some good ideas. The website is www.hopestreetcoalition.org.

A recording of today’s event (and other previous events on related topics) is available at Video Archives - Healing Minds NOLA

To read reviews of In the Matter of Edwin Potter go to www.Goodreads.com 

IMOEP available at Amazon, Goodreads, Barnes & Noble, and www.davidegeiger.com

 

David Geiger is a retired licensed and awarded electrical engineer who spent 7 years in psychiatric hospitals and over 40 years since 1979 in the courts as a result of his schizophrenia.

Correction: Genetics vs. Neurology in Schizophrenia

AdobeStock_184010116.jpeg

I made an error recently regarding the origins of schizophrenia, so I corresponded with my friend Linda Stalters, MSN, APRN (retired), founder and former CEO of SARDAA (Schizophrenia And Related Disorders Alliance of America). Her comment to me was that schizophrenia “is more than just genetics.” It is a neurological brain disorder/illness. Very briefly:

The brain is the center of the central nervous system. Whether due to genes or genetic mutation, maternal exposure to virus or other environmental causes interferes with brain development. Changes in the neuro-circuitry causes the symptoms that currently define the schizophrenia spectrum. (As a note, schizophrenia is a spectrum illness just as much as, for example, autism is.) It can be called neurocircuitry disorder, neuro-developmental disorder, or neurological brain disorder/illness.

All the more reason that schizophrenia should not be treated as a crime.

To read reviews of In the Matter of Edwin Potter go to www.Goodreads.com

IMOEP available at Amazon, Goodreads, Barnes & Noble, and www.davidegeiger.com

 

David Geiger is a licensed and awarded electrical engineer who spent 7 years in psychiatric hospitals and over 40 years since 1979 in the courts as a result of his schizophrenia.

 

What is the Problem with Criminal Justice?

AdobeStock_316319080.jpeg

I have a difficult article today having to do with mental illness and the Law. It comes from experience.

According to some psychiatrists, the mentally ill are seen as hostile and undesirable because their illnesses are left untreated – by Law as the person cannot be given treatment against his will – and left to worsen until they finally kill someone and become an enemy of the State. The public then demands that the Law – not doctors – address the issue by throwing them into prison. This is useless. The only thing that happens is that the mentally ill end up with a prison record with all that entails and with no medical treatment of value. Medical research has shown that mental illness is a genetic problem not a behavioral one.

A word to the wise: I have been told in my own experience that “the Court is not your friend.” You will pay the price if you believe otherwise. I say the criminal justice system is the problem, not the guy with the illness. You will understand when the Court takes your kids away from you as they did me because you sent them Hallmark cards once per month. I am telling you.

To read reviews of In the Matter of Edwin Potter go to www.Goodreads.com

IMOEP available at Amazon, Goodreads, and Barnes & Noble.

 

David Geiger is a licensed and awarded electrical engineer who spent 7 years in psychiatric hospitals and over 40 years since 1979 in the courts as a result of his schizophrenia.

Homelessness Again

AdobeStock_245215718.jpeg

It really is hard to get anything done while COVID-19 is about.


I am interested in homelessness issues for those who are formerly incarcerated. I was homeless once. Fortunately, I did not have to live on the street, but it was certainly not home sweet home. I was getting divorced at the time – nasty stuff! Maybe I will write about this some other time. Read my book in the meantime. It is in there.

Joanne Page, President and CEO of The Fortune Society in NYC, wrote an article for the NY Daily News titled “People with Arrest Records Have Housing Rights, Too.” She said that once the applicant’s criminal history shows up, it is GAME OVER.

Winter is an especially bad time of year to be without a place to live as anytime is. When released from prison, there is nothing for the individual except a maze of homeless shelters with almost no support or services. Landlords check the backgrounds of entire families, so if one person has a criminal history, it is GAME OVER for all of them.

So, The Fortune Society is urging the NYC Council to pass the Fair Chance Housing bill, Intro 2047, which is similar to laws passed in a dozen localities across the country. It also mirrors guidance from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, which directs landlords to consider other factors, including rehabilitation.


To read reviews of In the Matter of Edwin Potter, go to www.Goodreads.com

Available at Amazon, Goodreads, and Barnes & Noble.

 

David Geiger is a licensed and awarded electrical engineer who spent 7 years in psychiatric hospitals and over 40 years since 1979 in the courts as a result of his schizophrenia.

 

Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to All!

AdobeStock_112768542.jpg

From David E. Geiger, MEE, PE

Happy Holidays to One and All! May next year be better than what we were dealt in 2020.

To read additional reviews of In the Matter of Edwin Potter go to www.Goodreads.com.

David Geiger is a licensed and awarded electrical engineer who spent 7 years in psychiatric hospitals and over 40 years since 1979 in the courts as a result of his schizophrenia.

 

Roots of the Asylum

This week I asked Lynn Nanos, LICSW, to be a guest blogger. She is a graduate of Columbia University and the author of the best-selling and award-winning book Breakdown: A Clinician's Experience in a Broken System of Emergency Psychiatry.  

 

February 16, 2020 | asylum, bipolar disorder, housing, mental health law, psychiatric treatment, psychiatry, psychosis, schizophrenia

Asylum.png

Understanding history can help legislators and physicians understand the present and prevent a repetition of mistakes. How the government should treat mentally ill (really brain-diseased) people and where it should house has always stirred up contentiousness among policymakers and personal caregivers. In 1676, the Upland Court of the Pennsylvania colony ordered a village, with the provision of government funds, to build a house solely for the containment of a mentally ill person's dangerous behaviors because no other safe living arrangement.[1] 

In northern American colonial times, “poor” people were not just financially impoverished. They had a variety of ailments, disabilities, and illnesses, including mental illness, deafness, blindness, and paralysis of limbs. Many family members or friends of the afflicted cared for poor people in their homes unless they were too violent and unruly. 

If no personal supervision was possible, the government invoked care and protection of those who were dangerous (e.g., unable to attend to their basic biological needs due to profound psychosis). In the 1700s, before governments built the insane asylums, they housed and cared for poor people in jails, prisons, and almshouses. The first almshouse existed in Boston, Massachusetts, and segregated residents who behaved abnormally from others, especially in attics or cellars. The impossibility of pharmaceutical sedation limited caregivers to containing aggression and agitation by shackling them to immobile structures. 

Salaried-doctors began training students in almshouses. By the end of the American colonial period, almshouses became hospitals.[2] In 1769, the first hospital in the American colonies opened in Williamsburg, Virginia. “Every general practitioner in the pre-Civil War era agreed that insanity was a disease of the brain and that the examination of tissues in an autopsy would reveal organic lesions, clear evidence of physical damage, in every insane person.”[3] A leading physician, Isaac Ray, confidently stated that if pathological autopsy of an insane person showed no abnormality, this just meant that the methods of examination were too crude and not yet advanced.[4] Physicians routinely linked physical ailments to mental distress and recognized that an accidental blunt force to the head could cause insanity.  

I remember sipping Greek coffee with my grandmother, aunt, and uncle on the veranda of the house where my father was born and raised. He grew up in Leontari, a tiny rural village in the Greek mountains. They were curious about my profession as I answered many of their questions. Suddenly and coincidentally, we overheard a woman speaking loudly in a disorganized and delusional way as she walked on the road by our house. My grandmother reacted to the sick woman using her native Greek language: "There goes the crazy lady again." The chances of this presumably schizophrenic woman getting treatment for this seemed slim to zero. Leontari's lack of resources, and thus statistics, rendered her invisible to any scientist trying to figure out the prevalence of the disorder. I suspect schizophrenia is just as prevalent in rural areas as it is in cities. Wilhelm, Griesinger, a German neurologist and psychiatrist, reasoned that the prevalence of insanity appeared higher in urban and more advanced countries because treatment, and thus statistical tracking, were better there.[5] 

 A tragic and disappointing pivot ensued despite physicians expressing no doubt that biological factors caused mental illness. Many of them did not pursue neurological research and rather blamed social dysfunction and stress for mental illness (e.g., loss of property, familial conflict). Even Dorothea Dix, who advocated to improve the treatment toward the sickest of the sick, rhetorically asked the Pennsylvania legislature, “Is it not to the habits, the customs, the temptations of civilized life and society” that caused most of these illnesses?[6] She then referred to rural neighborhoods not encompassing the same prevalence of disorders she witnessed in urban areas. 

The notion that the environment, especially the chaos of cities, caused insanity prevailed in the American colonies. The founders of the first public asylums, including medical director Samuel Woodward of Worcester State Hospital in Massachusetts, were confident that mental illness could be cured under the right conditions. They built asylums that eliminated urban irritants. Blandness, uniformity, order, and consistent decor and architecture were the hallmarks of the new asylums. Governments intentionally built them in rural areas close enough to cities for staff members to gather resources to manage the hospitals, yet far enough away to protect patients from the untethered dangers of cities. The medical directors believed that consistent schedules and routines involving work and leisure were curative. They invoked and enforced order, regularity, discipline, and routine in patients’ daily lives. The directors believed that such structures and functions would thwart the debilitating influences of the chaotic and urban environment. Yet no research ever showed that any of these measures were therapeutic. 

 After the Civil War, physicians considered that mental illness was genetic, but in cautionary fashion, still touted the belief that heredity alone could not cause mental illness. Deinstitutionalization occurred many decades later. Criteria for inpatient admission eventually became overly restrictive. Inpatient lengths of stay dwindled. Although we still don’t have a cure for mental illness, we are certain that what’s typically referred to as mental illness is really a brain disease. In my upcoming articles, I will report on the book, Madness in the Streets: How Psychiatry and the Law Abandoned the Mentally Ill, by Rael Isaac and Virginia C. Armat, which illustrates how and why the antipsychiatry movement began. 

 

[1]Rothman, David J. The Discovery of the Asylum: Social Order and Disorder in the New Republic. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, 1971.

[2]Shryock, Richard H. Medicine and Society in America: 1660-1860. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1960.

[3]Rothman, David J. The Discovery of the Asylum: Social Order and Disorder in the New Republic. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, 1971.

[4]Ray, Isaac. A Treatise on the Medical Jurisprudence of Insanity, 3rd ed., 69:129–30. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, 1853.

[5]Griesinger, Wilhelm. Mental Pathology and Therapeutics, 2nd ed., 138–39. London: New Sydenham Society, 1867.

[6]Dix, Dorothea Lynde. Memorial Soliciting a State Hospital for the Insane, Submitted to the Legislature of Pennsylvania. Harrisburg, PA, February 3, 1845.


 

Lynn Nanos, L.I.C.S.W., is the best-selling and award-winning author of Breakdown: A Clinician's Experience in a Broken System of Emergency Psychiatry.  Read more at www.LynnNanos.com.

To read reviews of In the Matter of Edwin Potter go to www.Goodreads.com

 David Geiger is a licensed and awarded electrical engineer who spent 7 years in psychiatric hospitals and over 40 years since 1979 in the courts as a result of his schizophrenia.

What You Do for the Least, You Do for Me

AdobeStock_184833314.jpeg

This past Sunday was the Feast of Christ the King and the end of the Catholic Church year. Next week the new year begins with the start of Advent.

We are instructed to be like Christ. How can we do that? We are but mere mortals. The writer of the Gospel makes it clear: feed the hungry, give to the poor, clothe the naked, and visit those in prison. We usually skimp on that last one, but they are all of that and more: sick and tired, poor and hungry, living in the street.

There are a number of organizations that I am aware of who try to do the right thing by those system-involved. They have come to realize that society cannot do it all, so they make a strong effort to educate as well as to help them develop job skills and find housing. These are:

Paulists Prison Ministry - (Rev.) Frank DeSiano 800-237-5515

The Fortune Society: Building People, Not Prisons – JoAnne Page, info@fortunesociety.org

Inner-city Scholarship Fund – 212-753-8583

John Jay College of Criminal Justice Institute of Justice and Opportunity – Ann Jacobs Justiceandopportunity@jjay.cuny.edu

SARDAA (Schizophrenia and Related Disorders Alliance of America) – Linda Stalters - 240-423-9432

Do something to make your family safer.

To read reviews of In the Matter of Edwin Potter go to www.Goodreads.com

 David Geiger is a licensed and awarded electrical engineer who spent 7 years in psychiatric hospitals and over 40 years since 1979 in the courts as a result of his schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia from the Point of View of an Emergency Clinician

AdobeStock_62118102.jpeg

I met Lynn Nanos, LICSW (Licensed Independent Clinical Social Worker) through my website. She is a graduate of Columbia University and the author of Breakdown: A Clinician’s Experience in a Broken System of Emergency Psychiatry where she describes and summarizes her experiences as an emergency psychiatric clinician. I believe her book and mine complement each other. What follows is an excerpt from Chapter 18 “Stigma and Antipsychiatry.” 

*

Stigma toward mental illness embodies the belief that the mentally ill person caused her illness. It associates mental illness with shame, infamy, and disgrace. How much stigma exists toward mental illness? It is difficult to measure. Organizations that advocate for the mentally ill population, including the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), appear to overemphasize stigma. They portray it as a massive problem and urgently promote campaigns to eradicate it. But is stigma less problematic than the media and certain organizations make it out to be? Is NAMI’s claims about the extent of stigma a myth?

It is antiquated to apply shame to mental illness… It is now uniformly understood in all scientific areas that serious mental illness originates in the brain. The brain is just as much a physical and tangible organ as the liver, heart, and stomach. Leading research demonstrates that the greatest risk factor for bipolar disorder and schizophrenia lies in genetics, which confirms that serious mental illness is biological in origin…

The belief that mental illness doesn’t exist and that medication is largely unhelpful runs amok throughout government-funded programs. In Massachusetts, the Recovery Learning Communities (RLCs) are groups largely dominated by peer specialists who endorse the possibility that signs of psychosis are normal. Besides running Reiki sessions that seem frivolous because no scientific evidence shows their effectiveness, the groups regularly lead classes titled “Hearing Voices” for their members. They advertise that “Hearing Voices groups do not pathologize the experience of hearing voices or experiencing other altered/extreme states. Instead, they ask, ‘What does the experience mean to you?’”

To pathologize a human experience to view it as abnormal. Hearing voices that do not exist is certainly not normal. If an impressionable person in her early twenties is experiencing auditory hallucinations for the first time that involve commands to kill herself or someone else, and she attends one of these classes, the chance that she will seek appropriate treatment is reduced if she comes to believe that nothing abnormal is going on…

For months in 2017, Western Mass RLC advertised their seminars titled “Coming Off Psych Drugs,” which supported people planning to reduce or stop taking their prescribed psychiatric medications. Of course, seriously depressed people who are drug-resistant are better off using psychotherapy, self-help, (more)… Regardless of the illness, people who are not authorized to prescribe medication should not teach people how to reduce or stop taking medication, especially in a formal setting. Advanced nurse practitioners, physician’s assistants, or medical doctors do not lead these seminars. I cannot imagine that anyone who lacked awareness of her psychosis benefited from this class.

In July 2017, I testified at the Boston State House in favor of a bill to implement Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT), which is described later. At the hearing, most of the opposition to AOT came from peer specialists… When they do not deny the existence of mental illness, RLCs minimize it. Minimizing mental illness is not far off from believing that it doesn’t exist. Followers of RLCs are either persuaded to believe that no mental illness exists and that medication is largely unhelpful or influenced to minimize mental illness and downplay the benefits of medication. Whenever mental illness and the importance of medication are minimized, psychiatry is devalued and considered less worthy of respect than other medical specialties. This is the essence of stigma.

 

Read more from Lynn Nanos at www.LynnNanos.com.

David Geiger is a licensed and awarded electrical engineer who spent 7 years in psychiatric hospitals and over 40 years since 1979 in the courts as a result of his schizophrenia.

The Case for Mental Illness and Criminal Justice Reform

AdobeStock_246612408Flip.jpg

Horror stories abound in the world of treatment for those with brain illness, for example, in the 1950s there was a group of people who moved to shut down psychiatric hospitals in favor of community mental health centers. They never set foot in a psych hospital and never treated a patient. Their influence lasted decades and brought us to where we are today.

Where are we today? Patients live in the street with drug addictions. Or they are incarcerated and “treated” by corrections officers who have no training in the field. Suicide is up. We hear horror stories from parents who try to get help for their child, but the law says their child cannot be given treatment against his will. The illness gets worse and worse until he kills somebody – a danger to himself or others, says the definition – and then he can be put in jail, given “treatment” and a criminal record.

My parents had a similar problem with me and testified to it in court at the trial. I had become a menace to society and ended up in the criminal legal system. Have you ever heard of such a thing? The jury acquitted me, however. It could have been avoided, but the burden of care falls upon the family in this system, and they had no idea where to go and told that to the judge.

Pete Earley, a former journalist with the Washington Post, had that problem with his son who also ended up in the criminal legal system before he received “treatment” in jail. Parents are sometimes advised to put their child in prison so that he can get “treatment.” Note that the three largest providers of mental health care in America are jails according to Alisa Roth who is a journalist and author of Insane: America’s Criminal Treatment of Mental Illness.

Insurance companies provide no help. They have the power to overrule the doctor’s medical decisions and advice.

These situations are aggravated by the presence of anosognosia which means that the patient has no awareness that he is ill. This is not denial of the illness. Denial would mean that he has some idea that he is ill. I also had this problem, but, again, the law says a person cannot be given treatment against his will. So, if the person does not believe that he has an illness, he will not consent to treatment, and the cycle begins.

Is it becoming clear why those with brain illness are despised and hated by society in general? Why do we not treat other illnesses this way? Imagine one with cardiac problems or diabetes being told to go away and wait until his condition worsens. By then it is too late. The same is true for those with brain illness. The brain is another organ that has another requirement for treatment. HIPPA, too, should be reformed. Physicians should be able to treat and discuss the patient just like a cardiac or other patient. 

But brain illness – mental illness – is not the behavioral problem that a court prosecutor or judge would have us believe. These problems are genetic as found recently by Deborah L. Levy, Ph.D., director of the Psychology Research Laboratory at McLean Hospital, the largest psychiatric affiliate of Harvard Medical School. She found in her research that schizophrenia is a genetic illness passed on from one generation to the next. Also, recently I heard in the news that gene-splicing techniques are improving, providing hope to those who suffer from this illness and society as well.

I recommend that legislators reform criminal justice and budget money to enhance research.

 

Written in the memory of Deborah L. Levy, Ph.D., who passed October 15, 2020. I was told by Linda Stalters that she greatly supported me.

 David Geiger is a licensed and awarded electrical engineer who spent 7 years in psychiatric hospitals and over 40 years since 1979 in the courts as a result of his schizophrenia.

COVID-19 In Our Jails and Prisons

CovidBehindBars_Final.jpg

Today’s topic is COVID-19 in our jails and prisons. There is so much wrong with our criminal legal system. People are dying. Keep in mind that not every person incarcerated is a caged monster. Many of these people have families to go home to.

Part of the argument is that prisoners cannot maintain the 6 feet distancing required by the CDC because of the size of the cages that they live in and the number of people who live in them. PPE equipment is not readily available. Slowing the spread of COVID-19 is not possible when testing is limited or unavailable. So, prisoners contract the virus, and the reality is that jails and prisons are breeding grounds for poor health. The result is that people die needlessly from the virus, leaving their children and grandchildren never to see them again. These are the same reasons that COVID-19 spreads in poorer sections of town. Corrections workers risk their own health as well.

It is the goal of some politicians to free early non-violent offenders who are scheduled for release.

Jabari Brisport wrote an opinion in the 9/22/2020 Gotham Gazette, “We must also remember the more than 300 people in the Buffalo Federal Immigration Detention Facility in Batavia, New York who are similarly experiencing horrid conditions. The federal government must halt its inhumane family separation and detention policies, and instead work towards comprehensive reform that supports our immigrant neighbors and ultimately puts an end to detention centers that are by their nature harmful and deadly.”

As prisons are de facto treatment centers for the mentally ill, this applies to them as well. 

David Geiger is a licensed and awarded electrical engineer who spent 7 years in psychiatric hospitals and over 40 years since 1979 in the courts as a result of his schizophrenia

Fair Chance for Housing Bill Introduction and Hearing

AdobeStock_289594416.jpeg

Submitted by David E. Geiger, MEE, PE

I submitted articles in the past that dealt with housing discrimination for those who got out of prison or the psychiatric hospital. What follows is something from the Institute of Justice and Opportunity’s newsletter (formerly Prisoner Re-entry Institute at John Jay College) that deals with recent action taken by the New York City Council on this matter.

On August 27, 2020, Council Member Stephen Levin introduced bill #2047-2020, which would make housing discrimination based on a person's conviction record illegal. On September 15th, City Council held a public hearing on the bill — Alison Wilkey, the Institute's Director of Public Policy; Salik Karim, the Institute's Advocacy Coordinator; and 15 other members of the Institute's Fair Chance for Housing Campaign testified, speaking about rampant housing discrimination and the urgent need for legislative action. Thank you to everyone who testified and those who joined to watch the hearing. 

Click here to read Alison's testimony and click here to read Salik's testimony

The Fair Chance for Housing Campaign has been working with the Council to craft a strong bill without carve-outs for certain types of convictions, and covering as much housing as possible, because everyone deserves housing. This is a big step toward outlawing racist discrimination-based on background check and ensuring a right to housing for all.

Click here to read Council Members Stephen Levin and Keith Powers' joint op-ed in the New York Daily News — "New Yorkers With Conviction Histories Need Homes Too." 

Follow the Campaign on twitter here. 

 

 David Geiger is a licensed and awarded electrical engineer who spent 7 years in psychiatric hospitals and over 40 years since 1979 in the courts as a result of his schizophrenia.

 

Here is an Answer to Crime

PrisonHospital.jpg

Released prisoners need schooling, jobs, housing, drug rehab, and mentors. This is the answer I have been saying since May 1998. It works, but it is rarely implemented. Why? Too many people will lose their jobs and thereby ruin the economy? Hanging is too good for them? Show no mercy? They have been tried, and they do not work. You would have to kill everybody to make them work. I’m suggesting a better answer.

It is a little bit more difficult to express the needs of those with mental illness. Their problems are genetic as shown by Deborah L. Levy, Ph.D., director of the Psychology Research Laboratory at McLean Hospital, the largest psychiatric affiliate of Harvard Medical School. Jail is not the place where we are going to find the answers for them although the three largest providers of mental health care in America are jails according to Alisa Roth who is a journalist and author of Insane: America’s Criminal Treatment of Mental Illness.

Let us get started. The John Jay College Institute for Justice and Opportunity in New York City has already begun, and I do make recommendations to them from time to time.

 

David Geiger is a licensed and awarded electrical engineer who spent 7 years in psychiatric hospitals and over 40 years since 1979 in the courts as a result of his schizophrenia.